• D Saraste, U Gunnarsson, and M Janson.
• Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden. deborah.saraste@karolinska.se
• Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;39(6):634-9.

BackgroundConsidering the morbidity and mortality after abdominal surgery for rectal cancer, our aim was to determine whether local excision in Stage I rectal cancer provides long-term survival equivalent to TME surgery, particularly in elderly patients.MethodsData on 3694 consecutive patients with Stage I rectal cancer operated 1995-2006, were collected from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Register, a population-based, prospectively sampled data-base. Risk factors for death within 5 years after surgery, local recurrence rates, cumulative relative and overall survival rates were calculated for patients ≥ and <80 years-of-age. ASA grading related to surgical technique was analysed in a separate sample.ResultsLocal excision (LE) was associated with an increased mortality risk both ≥80 (HR 1.55) and <80 years-of-age (HR 1.45). After LE the 5-year local recurrence rate was 11.2% and the total and relative cumulative 5-year survival was 0.62 and 0.81 respectively. Hartmann's procedure (HA) showed an increased mortality risk only in younger patients (HR 2.15). The overall local recurrence rate was 7.2% with HA. Male gender (HR 1.70) and age (HR 1.06) were associated with a significantly increased mortality risk in all age groups. The ASA-grade was higher among patients operated with LE compared to Anterior Resection/Abdominoperineal resection.ConclusionLocal excision has a poor outcome in the elderly. A negative selection bias towards old age and high co-morbidity could explain this. Hartmann's procedure has a high risk for mortality and local recurrence in younger patients.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

34 keywords...

hide…