• J A De Andrés, E Febré, J Bellver, and R Bolinches.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1995 Mar 1;12(2):135-40.

AbstractContinuous and single dose spinal anaesthesia were compared in a prospective randomized fashion in 108 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Continuous spinal anaesthesia was via a 20 gauge polyamide multiperforated catheter introduced through an 18 gauge Tuohy needle. Single-dose spinal anaesthesia was performed with a 24 guage x 103 mm Sprotte spinal needle. The mean local anaesthetic dose for the continuous technique was 38.4 (SD 16.5) mg as hyperbaric lignocaine 5%, and for the single-dose spinal anaesthesia 10.8 (SD 2.2) mg as hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Segmental levels reached with the initial dose did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean time required to perform continuous spinal anaesthesia was 6.7 (SD 3.9) min, which was longer than for single dose 4.9 (SD 2.8) min (P < 0.05). The onset time and efficacy of anaesthesia, and the duration of the operation were similar in the two groups. Analgesia was inadequate in six patients who received continuous spinal anaesthesia (11%) and one patient who received single dose (2%) (P = 0.18). Hypotension was more frequent in those receiving single doses (P < 0.05). Caudal rotation of the outlet needle orifice to advance the catheter correlated with inadequate analgesia (P < 0.01, r = 0.38). There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications.

13 keywords...

hide…