-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · May 2012
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Observational Study[Evaluation of the efficiency of pharmacological antiemetic prophylaxis in different risk groups after general anaesthesia in the surgical population of Catalonia].
- V Mazo, P Vila, S Sabaté, C Orrego, J Canet, and Grupo PONVICAT.
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España.
- Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 May 1;59(5):244-53.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficiency of pharmacological antiemetic prophylaxis in patients subjected to surgery under general anaesthetic in different postoperative nausea and vomiting (NVPO) risk groups.Material And MethodsA randomised, observational, prospective and multicentre cohort study was conducted. The study included 1239 patients from 26 hospitals who were subjected to elective surgery under general anaesthesia. The data collected included, demographic characteristics, the NVPO risk factors, anaesthetic technique, type of surgery, the duration, fluid therapy, antiemetic prophylaxis administered, and the incidence of NVPO in the first 24h after surgery. A stratified analysis (low, moderate and high risk) was performed with the intention of evaluating the relationship between prophylaxis and NVPO using a logistic regression model adjusted for propensity score. The number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to prevent an NVPO episode was then calculated for each of the strata.ResultsThe incidence of NVPO in the low risk stratum was 21.6% without prophylaxis and 8.6% with prophylaxis, 31.3% compared to 17.7% in the moderate risk, and 46.5% compared to 32.7% in the high risk group. There was a significant protective effect in the three strata (odds ratio between treated and untreated patients) and in the NNT (95% CI) was 7 (5-11) in the low risk stratum, 7 (5-13) in that of the moderate risk, and 6 (4-16) in the high risk.ConclusionsThe efficiency of pharmacological antiemetic prophylaxis in patients subjected to surgery under general anaesthesia was similar in all risk groups. Not providing antiemetic prophylaxis in low risk patients may not be justified due to the cost-effectiveness criteria. Future clinical guidelines to improve the quality of health care of patients operated on under general anaesthesia should consider the advantages of a universal NVPO prophylaxis.Copyright © 2011 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier España. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.