• Christian Backer Mogensen, Inger Olsen, and Anette Rehn Thisted.
• Emergency Department, Hospital Soenderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark. christian.backer.mogensen@shs.regionsyddanmark.dk
• Dan Med J. 2013 Aug 1;60(8):A4682.

IntroductionPharmacists' advice may reduce medication errors in the emergency department (ED). However, pharmacists' recommendations are of little value if not acknowledged by physicians. The aim of the present study was to analyze how often and which categories of pharmacist recommendations were taken into account by the physicians in a Danish ED. Special attention is paid to problems of significant or vital importance.Material And MethodsClinical pharmacists reviewed patient files within 24 hours of admission, described medication issues and made recommendations for solutions. It was subsequently noted whether the recommendations were taken into account by the physicians. Independent specialists in internal medicine and geriatrics reviewed the recommendations and assessed whether they were of minimal, moderate, significant or vital importance.ResultsAmong the 301 recommendations made, 59% were followed by the physicians. The physician followed the recommendation made for patients admitted with medical problems significantly more often than the recommendations made for surgical patients (69% versus 51%, p = 0.002). In 47%, the recommendations were of significant or vital importance. Even these recommendations were acknowledged more by the physicians caring for medical patients than by physicians caring for surgical patients (78% versus 57%, p = 0.009). The difference remained significant in the multivariate analysis.ConclusionEven though the pharmacists' recommendations were followed in many cases in an ED, there is still room for improvement, especially for the surgical patients.FundingThe Amgros Research Foundation covered the costs for the independent specialists who reviewed the patient files.Trial RegistrationNCT01723462 (clinicaltrial.gov).

27 keywords...

hide…