-
Observational Study
A retrospective observational study on the treatment outcomes of 26 patients with spinal cord astrocytoma including two cases of malignant transformation.
- Seong Jun Ryu, Jong Yul Kim, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, and Se Hoon Kim.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, The Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211, Eonju-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-720, South Korea.
- Eur Spine J. 2016 Dec 1; 25 (12): 4067-4079.
PurposeTo determine the biologic behavior and prognostic factors of spinal cord astrocytoma, we reviewed surgical and clinical outcomes. Due to the rarity of spinal cord astrocytoma, there is a lack of research regarding this type of tumor and malignant transformation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data from all patients on whom we performed spinal cord tumor removal between 1983 and 2014. Twenty-six patients were pathologically confirmed to have spinal cord astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Surgical extent and disease progression were confirmed by the surgeon based on operative findings, postoperative MRI, and outpatient department (OPD) follow-up.ResultsPain or neurological deficit was the chief complaint for all patients. With MRI studies, there is a tendency for high-grade astrocytomas to show as enhanced and heterogeneous images. Two of the low-grade astrocytomas showed malignant transformation over the course of 4 and 11 months, respectively. The overall survival (OS) for low-grade astrocytoma was 28-480 months (mean 156.38 months); the OS for high-grade astrocytoma was 1-36 months (mean 12.00 months).ConclusionsTwo of 12 low-grade cases showed malignant transformations at 4 and 11 months, respectively, based on pathological confirmation. With spinal cord astrocytomas, enhanced MRI results appeared similar to those of a malignant lesion. We suggest close observation and image correlation of low-grade astrocytomas, even when pathologically confirmed as low-grade. In this review, we found that histologic grade is the most important prognostic factor, although it is not always concordant with biologic behaviors.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.