• J Kang, R J Robertson, F L Goss, S G Dasilva, R R Suminski, A C Utter, R F Zoeller, and K F Metz.
• Department of Health and Exercise Science, Rowan College of New Jersy, Glassboro 08028, USA. kang@heroes.rowan.edu
• Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Mar 1;29(3):377-82.

AbstractThis study was conducted to compare gross efficiency (GE), net efficiency (NE), work efficiency (WE), and delta efficiency (DE) between arm crank and cycle exercise at the same relative intensities. Eight college-aged males underwent two experimental trials presented in a randomized counterbalanced order. During each trial subjects performed three intermittent 7-min exercise bouts separated by 10-min rest intervals on an arm or semirecumbent leg ergometer. The power outputs for the three bouts of arm crank or cycle exercise corresponded to 50, 60, and 70% of the mode-specific VO2peak. GE, NE, and WE were determined as the ratio of Kcal.min-1 equivalent of power output to Kcal.min-1 of total energy expended, energy expended above rest and energy expended above unloaded exercise, respectively. DE was determined as the ratio of the increment of Kcal.min-1 of power output above the previous lower intensity to the increment of kcal.min-1 of total energy expended above the previous lower intensity. GE and NE did not differ between arm crank and cycle exercises. However, WE was lower (P < 0.05) during arm crank than cycle exercise at 50, 60, and 70% VO2peak. DE was also lower (P < 0.05) during arm crank than cycle exercise at delta 50-60 and at delta 60-70% VO2peak. It is concluded metabolic efficiency as determined by work and delta efficiency indices was lower during arm crank compared with cycle exercise at the same relative intensities. These findings add to the understanding of the difference in metabolic efficiency between upper and lower body exercise.

22 keywords...

hide…