-
Multicenter Study
Extranodal extension is a powerful prognostic factor in bladder cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.
- Harun Fajkovic, Eugene K Cha, Claudio Jeldres, Brian D Robinson, Michael Rink, Evanguelos Xylinas, Thomas F Chromecki, Eckart Breinl, Robert S Svatek, Gerhard Donner, Scott T Tagawa, Derya Tilki, Patrick J Bastian, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Bjoern G Volkmer, Giacomo Novara, Abdennabi Joual, Talia Faison, Guru Sonpavde, Siamak Daneshmand, Yair Lotan, Douglas S Scherr, and Shahrokh F Shariat.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, General Hospital Sankt Poelten, Sankt Poelten, Austria.
- Eur. Urol. 2013 Nov 1;64(5):837-45.
BackgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most powerful pathologic predictor of disease recurrence after radical cystectomy (RC). However, the outcomes of patients with LNM are highly variable.ObjectiveTo assess the prognostic value of extranodal extension (ENE) and other lymph node (LN) parameters.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsA retrospective analysis of 748 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and LNM treated with RC and lymphadenectomy without neoadjuvant therapy at 10 European and North American centers (median follow-up: 27 mo).InterventionAll subjects underwent RC and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.Outcome Measurements And Statistical AnalysisEach LNM was microscopically evaluated for the presence of ENE. The number of LNs removed, number of positive LNs, and LN density were recorded and calculated. Univariable and multivariable analyses addressed time to disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality after RC.Results And LimitationsA total of 375 patients (50.1%) had ENE. The median number of LNs removed, number of positive LNs, and LN density were 15, 2, and 15, respectively. The rate of ENE increased with advancing pT stage (p<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses that adjusted for the effects of established clinicopathologic features and LN parameters, ENE was associated with disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.31; p<0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.90; 95% CI, 1.52-2.37; p<0.001). The addition of ENE to a multivariable model that included pT stage, tumor grade, age, gender, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margin status, LN density, number of LNs removed, number of positive LNs, and adjuvant chemotherapy improved predictive accuracy for disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality from 70.3% to 77.8% (p<0.001) and from 71.8% to 77.8% (p=0.007), respectively. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective nature.ConclusionsENE is an independent predictor of both cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in RC patients with LNM. Knowledge of ENE status could help with patient counseling, clinical decision making regarding inclusion in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy, and tailored follow-up scheduling after RC.Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.