• Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. · Aug 1993

    Comparative Study

    Response time and reliability of three neonatal patient-triggered ventilators.

    • G Bernstein, J P Cleary, G P Heldt, J F Rosas, L D Schellenberg, and F L Mannino.
    • Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego School of Medicine.
    • Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1993 Aug 1;148(2):358-64.

    AbstractWe studied the response time (RT) and reliability of three neonatal patient-triggered ventilator (PTV) systems: the Draeger Babylog 8000, the Bear Cub enhancement module (CEM), and the Infrasonics Star Sync. In 10 adult rabbits, airway flow and pressure recordings showed the RT of the Star Sync to be shorter than that of the Bear CEM (53 +/- 13 versus 65 +/- 15 ms, p < 0.05), and both were shorter than that of the Babylog (95 +/- 24 ms, p < 0.01) by ANOVA. The RT of the Bear CEM and the Babylog increased significantly at decreased trigger sensitivity settings. All ventilators triggered successfully on assist-control (A/C). However, the Babylog had a higher rate of asynchrony on SIMV (30 +/- 25%) than the Bear CEM (1.1 +/- 0.3%) and the Star Sync (1.2 +/- 0.4%), p < 0.01. In 10 infants with respiratory failure, recordings of airway flow and pressure were made at ventilator inspiratory time (Ti) settings of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 s on assist-control and on SIMV at rates of 15, 30, 45, and 60 breaths/min. The Star Sync and Bear CEM triggered successfully on A/C (100%) and had low rates of asynchrony on SIMV (1 to 3%). The Babylog had a lower success rate on A/C (70 +/- 12%) and a higher rate of asynchrony on SIMV (29 +/- 30%) than the other two ventilators; p < 0.01. The lower reliability of the Babylog was due to its variable refractory period (0.2 to 0.5 s, to equal the set Ti).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…