-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: Design, rationale and implementation.
- Sarah Baraniuk, Barbara C Tilley, Deborah J del Junco, Erin E Fox, Gerald van Belle, Charles E Wade, Jeanette M Podbielski, Angela M Beeler, John R Hess, Eileen M Bulger, Martin A Schreiber, Kenji Inaba, Timothy C Fabian, Jeffrey D Kerby, Mitchell Jay Cohen, Christopher N Miller, Sandro Rizoli, Thomas M Scalea, Terence O'Keeffe, Karen J Brasel, Bryan A Cotton, Peter Muskat, John B Holcomb, and PROPPR Study Group.
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States. Electronic address: Mary.Baraniuk@uth.tmc.edu.
- Injury. 2014 Sep 1; 45 (9): 1287-95.
BackgroundForty percent of in-hospital deaths among injured patients involve massive truncal haemorrhage. These deaths may be prevented with rapid haemorrhage control and improved resuscitation techniques. The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial was designed to determine if there is a difference in mortality between subjects who received different ratios of FDA approved blood products. This report describes the design and implementation of PROPPR.Study DesignPROPPR was designed as a randomized, two-group, Phase III trial conducted in subjects with the highest level of trauma activation and predicted to have a massive transfusion. Subjects at 12 North American level 1 trauma centres were randomized into one of two standard transfusion ratio interventions: 1:1:1 or 1:1:2, (plasma, platelets, and red blood cells). Clinical data and serial blood samples were collected under Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) regulations. Co-primary mortality endpoints of 24h and 30 days were evaluated.ResultsBetween August 2012 and December 2013, 680 patients were randomized. The overall median time from admission to randomization was 26min. PROPPR enrolled at higher than expected rates with fewer than expected protocol deviations.ConclusionPROPPR is the largest randomized study to enrol severely bleeding patients. This study showed that rapidly enrolling and successfully providing randomized blood products to severely injured patients in an EFIC study is feasible. PROPPR was able to achieve these goals by utilizing a collaborative structure and developing successful procedures and design elements that can be part of future trauma studies.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.