• J Pain · Mar 2003

    Comparative Study

    Validity of pain intensity assessment in persons with cerebral palsy: a comparison of six scales.

    • Mark P Jensen, Joyce M Engel, Kimberly A McKearnan, and Amy J Hoffman.
    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-6490, USA. mjensen@u.washington.edu
    • J Pain. 2003 Mar 1;4(2):56-63.

    AbstractChronic pain is a common condition in persons with cerebral palsy (CP), although there is a paucity of research studying CP-related pain. One of the barriers to a better understanding of pain in persons with CP is the lack of information concerning the validity of pain measures that may be used with this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative validity of several pain measures in a sample of persons with CP-related pain. Six pain rating scales and measures of depression and pain interference were administered to a sample of 45 adults participating in a longitudinal study of pain in persons with CP. An additional 24 persons with CP were administered 5 of the 6 pain intensity scales. The results of factor analyses support the validity of each measure of pain in this sample of persons with CP. However, an examination of the pattern of associations between each of the pain ratings with measures of pain interference and depression suggest that the 7-point Faces Scale may be somewhat less valid than the other measures.2003 by the American Pain Society

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…