• Michael D Goodman, Nathan L Huber, Jay A Johannigman, and Timothy A Pritts.
• Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. goodmamd@uc.edu
• Am. J. Surg. 2010 Feb 1;199(2):199-203.

BackgroundDefinitive practice guidelines regarding the utility of chest x-ray (CXR) following chest tube removal in trauma patients have not been established. The authors hypothesized that the selective use of CXR following chest tube removal is safe and cost effective.MethodsA retrospective review of chest tube insertions performed at a level I trauma center was conducted.ResultsPatients who underwent chest tube removal without subsequent CXR had a lower mean Injury Severity Score and were less likely to have suffered penetrating thoracic injuries. These patients received fewer total CXRs and had shorter durations of chest tube therapy and shorter lengths of stay following tube removal. Subsequent reinterventions were performed more frequently in the CXR group. The annual decrease in hospital charges by foregoing a CXR was $16,280.ConclusionsThe selective omission of CXR following chest tube removal in less severely injured, nonventilated patients does not adversely affect outcomes or increase reintervention rates. Avoiding unnecessary routine CXR after chest tube removal could provide a significant reduction in total hospital charges.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…