• Pancreas · Jan 2007

    Comparative Study

    Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for biliary acute pancreatitis.

    • Erdal Göçmen, Yusuf Alper Klc, Omer Yoldaş, Tamer Ertan, Nazile Karaköse, Mahmut Koç, and Mesut Tez.
    • Fifth Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
    • Pancreas. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):66-9.

    ObjectivesThere are a few prospective studies assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis with exclusive criteria for biliary etiology. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of prediction of the severity and mortality of acute biliary pancreatitis by using the Ranson, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II and III, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Mortality Probability Model (MPM) II systems.MethodsFifty-eight patients with acute biliary pancreatitis were studied prospectively. Disease severity scores and mortality predictions were calculated using the collected data in the first 24 hours of admission and for Ranson score in the first 48 hours. Discrimination and calibration characteristics of each system were determined by using area under receiver operating characteristics curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively.ResultsAmong 58 patients included, there were 4 mortalities (6.8%). Fifteen patients (25.8%) had severe disease, and 5 patients (8.6%) had systemic and local complications. All systems had reliable power of discrimination and calibration. Among systems tested MPM II was the best performing as far as discrimination, and calibration characteristics are considered. The items of MPM II that were positive in patients with severe pancreatitis were those related to systemic perfusion.ConclusionsMortality Probability Model II predicted mortality at admission is better than the other systems in predicting the severity of pancreatitis. Results also indicate the important role of systemic perfusion at the early phases of acute pancreatitis in the progression of disease.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.