• I Haverkate, J J van Delden, A B van Nijen, and G van der Wal.
• Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Crit. Care Med. 2000 Aug 1;28(8):3039-43.

ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence and analyze the content of guidelines for the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in Dutch hospitals.DesignCross-sectional descriptive study.Measurements And Main ResultsA questionnaire was mailed to the directors of patient care at all 143 Dutch hospitals. Directors were asked whether their hospitals had guidelines for the use of DNR orders and to provide copies of the guidelines if they did. The content of the guidelines was analyzed with regard to basic assumptions about nonresuscitation, definitions, persons involved in decision-making, advance directives, starting discussions about nonresuscitation, notation, evaluation, and other aspects. Of the 143 hospital directors surveyed, 95% responded. Sixty percent of the hospitals had guidelines for the use of DNR orders and provided copies. The assumption "always resuscitate, unless" was mentioned in 66% of guidelines. In 93% it was stated that patients should be involved in decision-making about nonfutile resuscitation. In 38% it was stated that in principle, living wills were respected in cases of incompetence. The role of proxies was mainly to discuss decisions (58% of guidelines), not to make them. The most frequently mentioned moment for starting a discussion about nonresuscitation was the onset of clinical deterioration of the patient (41%).ConclusionsIt is promising that 60% of Dutch hospitals have developed guidelines for the use of DNR orders. However, current guidelines can be improved in many respects.

10 keywords...

hide…