• Yi-Jung Chang, Hsun-Chin Chao, Chao-Jan Wang, Wan-Chak Lo, and Dah-Chin Yan.
• Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Tauyuan, Taiwan.
• Pediatr Neonatol. 2013 Aug 1;54(4):235-8.

BackgroundAlthough ultrasound is often the preferred pediatric imaging modality for the evaluation of intussusception in children, many institutions lack access to ultrasound at night. This study characterized the day- and nighttime use of radiographic imaging for evaluation of intussusception.MethodsThe charts of pediatric patients evaluated for intussusception between January 2010 and December 2010 were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the day- and nighttime use of radiographic imaging. Patients were stratified into day and night groups according to when the imaging studies were performed, and differences in the clinical characteristics, imaging studies, cost, and final diagnosis were compared.ResultsPediatric consultations were performed for 86 suspected intussusceptions: 40 (46.5%) during the day [38 (95%) ultrasounds and 33 (82.5%) plain abdominal X-rays] and 46 at night [3 (6.5%) computed tomography and 39 (84.7%) plain abdominal X-rays]. The rate of positive enemas was significantly higher during the day than at night (97.5% vs. 52.2%, p < 0.001). The radiation dose during the initial survey was significantly lower during the day than at night (0.63 ± 0.48 vs. 2.06 ± 1.48 mSv, p < 0.001).ConclusionRadiographic imaging at night results in higher radiation exposure and negative enema findings. Twenty-four-hour ultrasound availability would decrease the radiation exposure and unnecessary enemas for intussusceptions suspected clinically.Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

33 keywords...

hide…