• Eric R Swanson, David E Fosnocht, Ken Matthews, and Erik D Barton.
• Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah Health Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. eric.swanson@hsc.utah.edu
• Air Med. J. 2004 Jan 1;23(1):36-9.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to compare intubation success rate and time to intubation for the intubating laryngeal mask airway (I-LMA) versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) using a manikin model during a simulated in-flight scenario.SettingThe setting for the study was a University hospital-based air medical program.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Eight nurses and 7 paramedics were randomly assigned to perform 3 intubations with either the I-LMA or DL first and then 3 intubations using the alternate technique. Descriptive statistics, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of means, and Fisher's Exact test were conducted for comparisons.ResultsFifteen set-ups and 45 intubations were performed with each technique. Previous experience was 74 mm (95% CI 64-84) with DL and 18 mm (95% CI 9-27) with the I-LMA. Set-up time was 33 seconds (95% CI 26-40) for DL and 40 seconds (95% CI 29-50) for I-LMA. Time to intubation was 12 seconds (95% CI 10-14) for DL and 39 seconds (95% CI 31-48) for I-LMA. Success rate was 100% for DL and I-LMA placement and 98% for intubation through the I-LMA. Crew rated difficulty of DL 13 mm (95% CI 6-20), placing the I-LMA 23 mm (95% CI 13-32), and intubating through the I-LMA 17 mm (95% CI 10-24).ConclusionIntubation success was very high for both DL and the I-LMA, despite less flight crew experience with the I-LMA. Total time to intubation was longer with the I-LMA but still less than 1 minute. The flight crews considered both techniques easy to perform. The I-LMA appears to be a useful adjunct for airway management in the Bell 206-L3 helicopter.

9 keywords...

hide…