• A A Rakshasbhuvankar and S K Patole.
• Department of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: abhijeet.rakshasbhuvankar@health.wa.gov.au.
• Resuscitation. 2014 Oct 1; 85 (10): 1320-3.

BackgroundSimulation-based training (SBT) is being more frequently recommended for neonatal resuscitation education (NRE). It is important to assess if SBT improves clinical outcomes as neonatal resuscitation aims to improve survival without long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. We aimed to assess the evidence supporting benefits of SBT in NRE.MethodA systematic review was conducted using the Cochrane methodology. PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane databases were searched. Related abstracts were scanned and full texts of the potentially relevant articles were studied. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies with controls (non-RCT) assessing SBT for NRE were eligible for inclusion in the review.ResultsFour small studies [three RCT (n=126) and one non-RCT (n=60)] evaluated SBT for NRE. Participants included medical students (one RCT and one non-RCT), residents (one RCT) and nursing staff (one RCT). Outcomes included performance in a simulation scenario, theoretical knowledge, and confidence in leading a resuscitation scenario. One RCT favoured simulation [improved resuscitation score (p=0.016), 2.31 more number of critical actions (p=0.017) and decreased time to achieve resuscitation steps (p=<0.001)]. The remaining two RCTs and the non-RCT did not find any difference between SBT and alternate methods of instruction. None of the four studies reported clinical outcomes.ConclusionsEvidence regarding benefits of SBT for NRE is limited. There are no data on clinical outcomes following SBT for NRE. Large RCTs assessing clinically important outcomes are required before SBT can be recommended widely for NRE.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

8 keywords...

hide…