• Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. · Jun 2014

    Predictors of contact tracing completion and outcomes in tuberculosis: a 21-year retrospective cohort study.

    • M J Saunders, G C K W Koh, A D Small, and M Dedicoat.
    • Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK.
    • Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2014 Jun 1;18(6):640-6.

    SettingBirmingham, UK, 1990-2010.ObjectiveTo identify predictors in contacts for completion of screening and of a positive screening outcome, i.e., a diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) or active tuberculosis (TB).DesignA retrospective cohort study of TB notifications for a European city.ResultsA total of 46,158 contacts were identified from 7365 index cases. Over the study period 17,471 (40.9%) failed to complete screening. Active TB or LTBI was diagnosed in 2220 (7.0%) contacts of cases of pulmonary TB (PTB) and in 222 (2.7%) contacts of cases of extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB). The proportion of contacts offered LTBI treatment increased (P < 0.001) over the study period. Age, ethnicity, sex and use of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) were the most important predictors of screening completion, with working age adult males who were Black or from the Indian subcontinent least likely to complete. Age, smear positivity status of the index case and IGRA usage were the most important predictors of a positive screening outcome (active TB or LTBI diagnosed).ConclusionContact tracing of both PTB and EPTB index cases is useful for active case finding. The findings of this study can be used to target screening and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of local contact tracing programmes.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…