-
Review Meta Analysis
A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of mivacurium for tracheal intubation.
Higher dosing, waiting longer or combining with an opioid improve mivacurium intubating conditions, particularly in older patients.
pearl- L E H Vanlinthout, S H Mesfin, N Hens, B F Vanacker, E N Robertson, and L H D J Booij.
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Anaesthesia. 2014 Dec 1;69(12):1377-87.
AbstractWe systematically reviewed factors associated with intubation conditions in randomised controlled trials of mivacurium, using random-effects meta-regression analysis. We included 29 studies of 1050 healthy participants. Four factors explained 72.9% of the variation in the probability of excellent intubation conditions: mivacurium dose, 24.4%; opioid use, 29.9%; time to intubation and age together, 18.6%. The odds ratio (95% CI) for excellent intubation was 3.14 (1.65-5.73) for doubling the mivacurium dose, 5.99 (2.14-15.18) for adding opioids to the intubation sequence, and 6.55 (6.01-7.74) for increasing the delay between mivacurium injection and airway insertion from 1 to 2 min in subjects aged 25 years and 2.17 (2.01-2.69) for subjects aged 70 years, p < 0.001 for all. We conclude that good conditions for tracheal intubation are more likely by delaying laryngoscopy after injecting a higher dose of mivacurium with an opioid, particularly in older people.© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
Notes
I find the existence of this study perplexing. This meta-analysis appears to simply confirm basic neuromuscular pharmacology and age-related cardiovascular changes. The unanswered question is why are they so interested in using mivacurium anyway?
I conclude that good conditions for tracheal intubation are more likely when using a muscle relaxant other than mivacurium.
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.