• Chirurg · Aug 2002

    Review Comparative Study

    [Appendicitis. Present-day diagnosis].

    • A Zielke.
    • Klinik für Visceral-, Thorax- und Gefässchirurgie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Baldinger Strasse, Postfach 100, 35043 Marburg. zielke@mailer.uni-marburg.de
    • Chirurg. 2002 Aug 1;73(8):782-90.

    AbstractAt times, making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis may pose a considerable problem. However, prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential to obtain minimal morbidity. Diagnostic mistakes result either in delayed initiation of adequate therapy or unnecessary operations. During the past years, a number of new strategies and diagnostic procedures have been developed and refined, including structured patient interview pathways, scoring systems, ultrasound, computed tomography, and diagnostic laparoscopy. This review summarizes the diagnostic performance of these modalities and discusses their clinical impact. It is apparent that in everyday practice, none of the technical modalities can replace the skill and precision of surgical exploration.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…