• Jacques S Lee, P Richard Verbeek, Michael J Schull, Lisa Calder, Ian G Stiell, John Trickett, Laurie J Morrison, Michael Nolan, Brian H Rowe, Sunil Sookram, David Ryan, Alex Kiss, and Gary Naglie.
• *Sunnybrook Research Institute,Toronto,ON.
• Can J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 1; 18 (2): 121-32.

ObjectivesWe conducted a program of research to derive and test the reliability of a clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk older adults using paramedics' observations.MethodsWe developed the Paramedics assessing Elders at Risk of Independence Loss (PERIL) checklist of 43 yes or no questions, including the Identifying Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool items. We trained 1,185 paramedics from three Ontario services to use this checklist, and assessed inter-observer reliability in a convenience sample. The primary outcome, return to the ED, hospitalization, or death within one month was assessed using provincial databases. We derived a prediction rule using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsWe enrolled 1,065 subjects, of which 764 (71.7%) had complete data. Inter-observer reliability was good or excellent for 40/43 questions. We derived a four-item rule: 1) "Problems in the home contributing to adverse outcomes?" (OR 1.43); 2) "Called 911 in the last 30 days?" (OR 1.72); 3) male (OR 1.38) and 4) lacks social support (OR 1.4). The PERIL rule performed better than a proxy measure of clinical judgment (AUC 0.62 vs. 0.56, p=0.02) and adherence was better for PERIL than for ISAR.ConclusionsThe four-item PERIL rule has good inter-observer reliability and adherence, and had advantages compared to a proxy measure of clinical judgment. The ISAR is an acceptable alternative, but adherence may be lower. If future research validates the PERIL rule, it could be used by emergency physicians and paramedic services to target preventative interventions for seniors identified as high-risk.

22 keywords...

hide…