-
- N V Lemeneva, V S Sorokin, and A Iu Lubnin.
- Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2008 Mar 1(2):22-6.
AbstractThe paper analyzes the clinical effectiveness of various blood-sparing techniques (hypervolemic hemodilution, isovolemic hemodilution, and instrumental infusion of washed autoerythrocytes) in neurosurgical interventions (n = 93) in 89 patients. Hypervolemic hemodilution that remains, however, to be the method of choice for young and low-weight children has proved to be the least clinically effective as a method for blood saving. The blood-sparing effectiveness of isovolmic hemodilution and instrumental reinfusion of washed autoerythrocytes is about the same, but the efficiency of reinfusion was higher with a blood loss volume of more than 100% of the proper volume of circulating complexes. A combination of hemodilution and instrumental reinfusion of autoerythrocytes provides a summation of blood-sparing effects for the mechanisms of blood saving vary with these techniques. The use of any blood-sparing technique accelerates and worsens hemostatic disorders.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.