• Laurence D Prina, Roger D White, and Elizabeth J Atkinson.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
• Resuscitation. 2002 May 1; 53 (2): 171-7.

Primary ObjectiveAutomated external defibrillators (AEDs) are used with increasing frequency in the United States by first responders (FR) such as police officers (PO) or firefighters (FF). However, FR satisfaction with use of AEDs has not been investigated. We hypothesized that FR satisfaction is comparable with that of paramedics (PA) and that, among those who have defibrillated with AEDs, those who have restored a pulse before PA arrival have a higher level of satisfaction than those who have not restored a pulse.Materials And MethodsA 21-item questionnaire with closed answers was sent to FR and PA in four communities. Each answer was scored 0, 1 or 2. A score between 10 and 16 correlated with the highest satisfaction level.Results276 out of 311 questionnaires were returned (89%). Two hundred and eleven respondents (35 PA, 70 FF and 106 PO) had used an AED and 99 FF and PO had restored a pulse before PA arrival. The satisfaction level of PO, FF and PA was high as demonstrated by the scores: 13.26, 13.07 and 13.39, respectively. Use of AED and pulse restoration resulted in higher scores than those of groups who had been trained only and who had not restored a pulse.ConclusionFR demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with using AEDs, and also had a favorable attitude toward implementation of AED use. Restoration of a pulse was clearly a factor responsible for a higher satisfaction. This positive attitude should encourage further implementation of early defibrillation programs in non-medical first responder settings.

14 keywords...

hide…