-
Critical care medicine · Nov 1998
Comparative StudyImproved outcome after severe head injury with a new therapy based on principles for brain volume regulation and preserved microcirculation.
- C Eker, B Asgeirsson, P O Grände, W Schalén, and C H Nordström.
- Department of Rehabilitation, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.
- Crit. Care Med. 1998 Nov 1;26(11):1881-6.
ObjectiveTo assess the new "Lund therapy" of posttraumatic brain edema, based on principles for brain-volume regulation and improved microcirculation.DesignA prospective, nonrandomized outcome study over a 5-yr period on severely head-injured patients with increased intracranial pressure, comparing the results with a historical control group with the same selection criteria for patients who were treated according to conventional principles.SettingGeneral intensive care unit of a university hospital.PatientsFifty-three consecutive head-injured patients with a Glasgow Coma Score of <8, and with increased intracranial pressure (>25 mm Hg), despite conventional treatment.InterventionsInterstitial fluid resorption was obtained by lowering intracapillary hydrostatic pressure, by preserving normal colloid osmotic pressure, and by maintaining a normovolemic (normal albumin/serum and hemoglobin/serum), not overtransfused patient. Intracapillary pressure was reduced by the combination of precapillary vasoconstriction (low-dose thiopental, dihydroergotamine) and reduction of mean arterial pressure, the latter attained with a beta1-antagonist (metoprolol 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg/24 hrs iv) and an alpha2-agonist (clonidine 0.4 to 0.8 microg/kg x 4 to 6 iv). Clonidine, in combination with normovolemia, also improves microcirculation by reducing catecholamines in plasma. Intracranial blood volume was reduced by arterial (low-dose thiopental sodium and dihydroergotamine) and large-vein (dihydroergotamine) vasoconstriction. The start dose of dihydroergotamine (maximum 0.9 microg/kg/hr) was successively reduced toward discontinuation within 4 to 5 days.Measurements And Main ResultsThere were 8% of patients who died and the neurologic conditions of 13% remained severely damaged, compared with 47% and 11%, respectively, for the control group.ConclusionsThe low mortality compared with previous outcome studies strongly indicates that this therapy improves outcome for severe head injuries. However, a randomized, controlled study is needed to reach general acceptance of this new therapy.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.