• I B Ross and C H Tator.
• Canadian Paraplegic Association, Toronto Hospital, Ontario.
• Neurosurgery. 1993 Sep 1;33(3):470-6; discussion 476-7.

AbstractThis study examined the effect of nimodipine or methylprednisolone on spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) and electrophysiological function after spinal cord injury in rats. Three groups of male rats (n = 10 per group) were injured by compression of the cord at T1 for 1 minute with a 52-g clip. The hydrogen clearance technique was used to measure SCBF at the T1 segment. Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded. SCBF and evoked potentials were measured before injury and again at approximately 1 and 2.5 hours after injury. The methylprednisolone group received a bolus of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) at 5 minutes after injury and then at 15 minutes after injury, the group received an infusion of methylprednisolone at 5.4 mg/kg per hour. The nimodipine group received placebo at 5 minutes and then received an infusion of nimodipine at 0.02 mg/kg per hour at 15 minutes. The placebo group received placebo at both times. Physiological parameters were closely monitored and maintained within the normal range. Albumin was administered after injury to maintain mean arterial blood pressure at or above 80 mm Hg. The infusions were continued for approximately 3 hours after spinal cord injury. SCBF was not significantly different between the experimental groups at either 1 or 2.5 hours postinjury (P = 0.16 and 0.71, respectively), and evoked potential responses did not return in any rat at any time after injury. Thus, this experiment failed to demonstrate an improvement in SCBF or electrophysiological function with either drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

24 keywords...

hide…