• David J Karras, Linda K Kruus, Brigitte M Baumann, John J Cienki, Michelle Blanda, Susan A Stern, and Edward A Panacek.
• Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. david.karras@tuhs.temple.edu
• Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jun 1;13(6):637-44.

BackgroundPeriodic surveys of research directors (RDs) in emergency medicine (EM) are useful to assess the specialty's development and evolution of the RD role.ObjectivesTo assess associations between characteristics and research productivity of RDs and EM programs.MethodsA survey of EM RDs was developed using the nominal group technique and pilot tested. RDs or surrogate respondents at programs certified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were contacted by e-mail in early 2005. The survey assessed programs' research infrastructure and productivity, as well as RD characteristics, responsibilities, and career satisfaction. Three measures of research productivity were empirically defined: research publications, grant awards, and grant revenue.ResultsResponses were received from 86% of 123 EM programs. Productivity was associated with the presence of nonclinical faculty, dedicated research coordinators, and reduced clinical hours for research faculty. Programs with an RD did not have greater research productivity, using any measure, than those without an RD. The majority of RDs cited pursuing their own studies, obtaining funding, research mentoring, and research administration to be major responsibilities. The majority characterized internal research funding, grant development support, and support from other faculty as inadequate. Most RDs are satisfied with their careers and expect to remain in the position for three or more years.ConclusionsResearch productivity of EM residency programs is associated with the presence of dedicated research faculty and staff and with reduced clinical demands for research faculty. Despite perceiving deficiencies in important resources, most RDs are professionally satisfied.

26 keywords...

hide…