• Anesthesiology · Apr 1991

    Comparative Study

    Simultaneous intraoperative measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution and transtracheal Doppler.

    • L C Siegel, D C Fitzgerald, and R H Engstrom.
    • Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.
    • Anesthesiology. 1991 Apr 1;74(4):664-9.

    AbstractIntraoperative measurement of cardiac output with transtracheal Doppler (DOP) was compared with that measured by thermodilution (TD). Cardiac output was measured simultaneously with both methods in 17 adult patients. For 86 pairs of measurements, the average difference between the two techniques was -0.21.min-1. This bias had a standard deviation of 1.71.min-1. The average of the absolute value of the difference between measurements made with the two techniques was 1.31.min-1, with a standard deviation of 1.11.min-1. The limits of agreement were -3.6 to 3.11.min-1. Linear regression yielded the following equation: DOP = 0.62 TD + 1.54 l.min-1 (r = 0.63). To evaluate the ability of transtracheal DOP to trend changes in cardiac output, the changes in cardiac output at sequential time points were compared for the two techniques. The average difference in the changes in cardiac output measured by the two techniques was 0.01.min-1. This bias had a standard deviation of 1.71.min-1. In conclusion, the transtracheal DOP technique did not reproduce the measurement of cardiac output by TD intraoperatively. Transtracheal DOP did not accurately trend changes in the TD measurement. These findings were obtained from patients with cardiovascular disease, and the conclusions may depend in part on the patient population and the investigators' experience with the transtracheal DOP technique.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…