• G B Avery.
• Children's National Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
• Semin. Perinatol. 1998 Jun 1;22(3):216-22.

AbstractThe purpose of this article is to summarize and comment on the history of medical decision making in the neonatal intensive care nursery, emphasizing considerations of futility. Several epochs will be described, with shifting roles of health care providers, the infant's family, and proxies for society at large. Futility has been an issue in the intensive care of newborn infants throughout the last 35 years. Long before the Baby Doe regulations and the formation of ethics committees, neonatologists tried to determine which care measures were indicated. Given the frequency of severe malformations, birth asphyxia, and extreme prematurity, it has been a common event for the responsible physician to ask himself: will this treatment be beneficial or merely futile? As the therapeutic armamentarium became more powerful and complex, the choices from among a possible array of interventions became increasingly difficult. The autonomy of parents as decision makers was increasingly affirmed. In the 1980s, the federal government, the courts, and frequent malpractice suits set boundaries on medical decision making. In the 1990s, third party payors became increasingly assertive in limiting resource expenditure. These legal and societal mandates are frequently at variance with one another. Thus the issue of medical futility, as it applies to neonates in the United States, must be considered unresolved.

13 keywords...

hide…