• Katrien B Hertegonne, Bart Rombaut, Philippe Houtmeyers, Georges Van Maele, and Dirk A Pevernagie.
• Department of Respiratory Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Katrien.Hertegonne@UGent.be
• Respiration. 2008 Jan 1;75(1):48-54.

BackgroundAuto-adjustable continuous positive airway pressure devices are widely used in titration procedures to determine therapeutic pressure levels in obstructive sleep apnea patients. However, differences in operational characteristics may influence the effect on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).ObjectivesWe compared the titration performance of two devices based on detection of inspiratory flow limitation, i.e. the Respironics REMstar Auto (RR) and the ResMed Spirit (RS).MethodsFifty obstructive sleep apnea patients were recruited for a double-blind randomized crossover trial. Both devices were employed overnight by means of split-night polysomnography. The primary outcome was the AHI. Secondary outcome measures were the snoring index, pressure profiles and subjective appraisal of sleep quality assessed the morning after the sleep study. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs was applied to assess differences between treatment conditions.ResultsNo significant differences were found in sleep parameters, subjective sleep quality and snoring index. The use of the RR was associated with a significantly lower AHI in comparison with the RS [mean (SD) 6.9 (11.6)/h vs. 9.4 (9.2)/h, p = 0.004]. This result was obtained at significantly lower pressure levels [P95 9.2 (2.3) cm H(2)O vs. 10.2 (1.5) cm H(2)O, p = 0.001].ConclusionWhile the RR provided a lower AHI than the RS at lower pressure levels, it could not be assessed whether this difference was relevant for clinical outcomes. However, this face-to-face comparison of Auto-adjustable continuous positive airway pressure devices seems useful for the assessment of titration efficacy.Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

33 keywords...

hide…