• Neurosurgery · Mar 1998

    Central nervous system infections after military missile head wounds.

    • B Aarabi, M Taghipour, E Alibaii, and A Kamgarpour.
    • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-2035, USA.
    • Neurosurgery. 1998 Mar 1; 42 (3): 500-7; discussion 507-9.

    ObjectivesTo evaluate variables instrumental in central nervous system infections after military missile head wounds, using uni- and multivariate analysis in 964 patients during the 8-year Iran-Iraq War.MethodsFactors considered in this retrospective study were: the types of projectile, mode of injury, paranasal sinus involvement, number of lobes involved, transventricular injuries, place of exploration (base hospital or Nemazee Hospital), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, retained bone, and retained shell fragments.ResultsDuring the study period, 105 patients (11%) developed central nervous system infections, including 20 abscesses, 1 case of cerebritis, 2 cases of fungus cerebri, and 82 cases of meningitis. gram-negative organisms, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae, were the most frequent offending organisms. Forty-one percent of the 133 deaths were due to infections, but the death rate from infection was only 4.4%. Univariate analysis showed mode of injury, number of lobes involved, ventricular penetration, paranasal sinus involvement, CSF fistulas, place of exploration, GCS score, and retained bone fragments to have significant bearing on the incidence of central nervous system infections. On the other hand, multivariate regression analysis disclosed the following factors each enhancing infection: CSF fistulas (chi2 = 46.526), transventricular injuries (chi2 = 13.4790), and paranasal petrous sinuses involvement (chi2 = 4.2221). When compared with primary exploration at the Nemazee Hospital, both exploration at a base hospital and no exploration at all were associated with increased chances of infection (chi2 = 4.7629 and 8.3220, respectively). Additionally, when tangential, crossed penetrating, and uncrossed penetrating injuries were compared with through-and-through injuries, the uncrossed penetrating mode was associated with less infection (chi2 = 0.1652, 2.6353, and 5.0817, respectively). Only two patients were readmitted for new evidence of infection 3 and 5 months after missile head wounds, one definitely due to and the other on suspicion of CSF fistulas. One hundred and thirty-seven of 587 patients with retained bone fragments were followed a mean of 42 months with no evidence of delayed infection.ConclusionIn this study, CSF fistulas and transventricular and paranasal sinus injuries all were associated with increased chances of central nervous system infections after military missile head wounds. Infection rate was lower in penetrating injuries not crossing into another dural compartment. Exploration at the Nemazee Hospital, despite delays in evacuation, had less incidence of infection than surgery at a base hospital within the first 24 hours of injury. Retained bone and metal fragments, a lower GCS score at the time of admission, secondary exploration at the Nemazee Hospital, and number of lobes involved were less important when evaluated in a multivariate regression model.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…