• World journal of urology · Jan 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Double-blind study with dipyrone versus tramadol and butylscopolamine in acute renal colic pain.

    • G Stankov, G Schmieder, G Zerle, S Schinzel, and K Brune.
    • DIAS Institute (Institute for Drug Investigation, Auditing and Statistics), Kirchheim/München, Germany.
    • World J Urol. 1994 Jan 1;12(3):155-61.

    AbstractTo investigate the combined analgesic and spasmolytic effect of dipyrone, 104 patients suffering from "severe" or "excruciating" colic pain due to a confirmed calculus in the upper urinary tract were randomized to receive i.v. either 2.5 g dipyrone (36 patients), 100 mg tramadol (35 patients), or 20 mg butylscopolamine (33 patients) in a multicentre, observer-blind, parallel-group study conducted in 8 German centres. The three treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, sex, height, and baseline pain intensity. Dipyrone was significantly more effective than tramadol in reducing pain for the primary endpoint, pain intensity differences (PID) at 20, 30, and 50 min after drug administration, and was significantly more effective than butylscopolamine at 30 and 50 min for the secondary efficacy endpoint, pain intensity differences on a categorical scale. Dipyrone had the highest SPID0-2 h of the three drugs (P < 0.05). Only 5 patients receiving dipyrone needed "rescue" medication as compared with 13 patients given tramadol and 11 patients receiving butylscopolamine. Adverse events were observed in 4 patients receiving butylscopolamine and in 1 patient each given dipyrone and tramadol. "Distinct" pain relief as assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) is a reliable method of determining the onset of analgesic action in the colic pain model.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…