• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Jan 2015

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial Observational Study

    Comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure device with invasive measurements in cardiovascular postsurgical intensive care patients: A prospective observational study.

    • Christoph Ilies, Genadi Grudev, Jürgen Hedderich, Jochen Renner, Markus Steinfath, Berthold Bein, Nils Haake, and Robert Hanss.
    • From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel (CI, GG, JR, MS, BB, RH), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Herz- und Gefäßklinik, Bad Neustadt an der Saale (GI), Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Schleswig-Holstein (NH), and Institute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany (JH).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jan 1;32(1):20-8.

    BackgroundArterial pressure monitoring using the a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) device during general anaesthesia is known to be interchangeable with continuous invasive arterial pressure (CIAP) monitoring. Agreement with invasive measurements in cardiovascular postsurgical intensive care patients has not been assessed.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to assess the agreement and interchangeability of CNAP with CIAP in cardiovascular postsurgical patients and to determine the effects of cardiac arrhythmia, catecholamine dosage, respiratory weaning and calibration intervals on agreement.DesignA prospective observational study.SettingGerman university hospital cardiovascular ICU. Data were collected from April 2010 to December 2011.PatientsFrom 110 enrolled patients, 104 were included. Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III or IV patients undergoing controlled ventilation. Exclusion criteria included emergencies, complete heart block and marked arterial pressure differences greater than 10 mmHg in the two arms.Main Outcome MeasuresBland-Altman plots, bias, precision, 95% limits of agreement, percentage error and agreement : tolerability indexes (ATIs) were estimated to determine clinical agreement.ResultsFrom 11 222 arterial pressure readings, biases (SD) for CIAP-CNAP for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for all patients were 4.3 (11.6), -9.4 (8) and -6 (7.6) mmHg, respectively. Cardiac arrhythmia (4.1 (13.1), -14.4 (8.3), -9.5 (8.9) mmHg) and long interval to last calibration [4.5 (15), -9.8 (9.5), -6.4 (9.1) mmHg] impaired the accuracy of CNAP with failed interchangeability criteria defined by the percentage error. In contrast, use of catecholamines (epinephrine or norepinephrine infusions >0.1 μg kg min), short calibration intervals and weaning conditions did not affect accuracy, interchangeability and agreement, especially of MAP. Agreement was defined as acceptable for MAP for all data and subgroups (ATI 0.8 to 1.0) and at worst, marginal for SAP and DAP (ATI 0.9 to 1.6).ConclusionCNAP showed acceptable agreement defined by the ATI with invasive measurements for MAP and partially for DAP, but there was considerable variability for SAP. MAP should be preferred for clinical decision making. Cardiac arrhythmia, in contrast to catecholamine dosage or weaning procedures, impaired the accuracy, agreement and interchangeability of CNAP.Trial RegistrationClinical trials.gov identifier NCT01003665.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.