-
Pediatric emergency care · May 2006
The interrater reliability of a validated bronchiolitis severity assessment tool.
- Paul Walsh, Adrian Gonzales, Amina Satar, and Stephen J Rothenberg.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield, CA 93305, USA. yousentwhohome@yahoo.com
- Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 May 1;22(5):316-20.
BackgroundWe previously constructed and tested a bronchiolitis severity assessment tool in 2 independent hospitals. The model uses age, work of breathing, dehydration and tachycardia to successfully predict disease severity.ObjectiveTo prospectively measure the interrater reliability of a bronchiolitis severity assessment tool and of its component variables.DesignProspective observational survey.SettingA county teaching hospital emergency department serving a mixed urban and rural population with an emergency medicine residency program in 2-3-4 format.SubjectsThirty-two physicians evaluated a convenience sample of children aged less than 18 months presenting to the emergency department with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis during a single season.MethodsTwo physicians independently examined each patient. Each physician completed a physical examination template that included the variables used in the severity assessment tool. Interrater agreement was measured for the variables work of breathing and dehydration and for the tool as a whole using a weighted kappa statistic.ResultsOne hundred and forty-six cases were enrolled. Twenty-five were dropped for incomplete data collection. The actual weighted agreement on overall classification was 92%; expected, 73%, kappa = 0.676; P < 0.0001. The actual weighted agreement for dehydration was at 95%; expected, 92%, kappa = 0.305; P = 0.0001. The agreement for work of breathing was 95%; expected, 86%; kappa = 0.611; P < 0.0001. The overall model showed better interrater reliability than its individual components.ConclusionsOverall interrater reliability for this bronchiolitis severity assessment tool is substantial.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.