• The Journal of urology · Jan 1996

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Patient controlled analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy: the effect of self-administered alfentanil on pain intensity and drug requirement.

    • G Schelling, W Weber, G Mendl, H Braun, and H Cullmann.
    • Institute of Anesthesiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
    • J. Urol. 1996 Jan 1;155(1):43-7.

    PurposeSecond generation lithotriptors offer immersion-free treatment and a decrease in shock wave induced pain. Pain sensations caused by advanced lithotriptors vary widely and have a significant impact on clinical management. We tested patient controlled analgesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and quantified analgesic requirements by means of patient controlled analgesia during ESWL of renal stones.Materials And MethodsPatients with renal stone disease undergoing ESWL were randomized prospectively to receive an alfentanil infusion titrated by 4 different anesthesiologists not otherwise involved in the study (22 controls) or to self-administer alfentanil via a patient controlled infusion pump (22 patients). As a measure of individual pain sensitivity the detection, pain and tolerance thresholds of electrocutaneous sensitivity were determined in all patients.ResultsAlfentanil was used more often in the patient controlled analgesia group than in the control patients (12 versus 8 required the narcotic, respectively, p = 0.226). Patients using patient controlled analgesia needed less drug (0.5 versus 2.15 mg., p = 0.005, median values), tolerated higher discharge voltages and pain intensities, needed significantly fewer shock waves to complete stone fragmentation (1,612 versus 2,105, p = 0.014) and had shorter treatment times (36.9 versus 46.2 minutes, p = 0.069). There was a significant correlation between the duration of shock wave exposure tolerated without analgesia, and pain (p = 0.0009) and tolerance (p = 0.0020) thresholds but not with regard to detection thresholds (p = 0.1400). Male patients showed significantly higher tolerance thresholds to electrocutaneous stimulation (10.2 versus 6.9 mA., p = 0.0238), which corresponded to longer analgesia-free treatment times in male versus female patients (31.7 versus 19.4 minutes, p = 0.0510).ConclusionsPatient controlled analgesia increases pain tolerance, decreases narcotic requirements, simplifies ESWL as an outpatient procedure and can be used to quantify analgesic requirements during lithotripsy. Pain and tolerance thresholds of electrocutaneous sensitivity are sensitive markers of pain tolerance during lithotripsy, which may be more pronounced in male patients.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.