• Cancer research · Nov 2001

    Comparative Study

    Urea as a recovery marker for quantitative assessment of tumor interstitial solutes with microdialysis.

    • S N Ettinger, C C Poellmann, N A Wisniewski, A A Gaskin, J S Shoemaker, J M Poulson, M W Dewhirst, and B Klitzman.
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
    • Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 1;61(21):7964-70.

    AbstractMicrodialysis is a technique that enables measurement of extracellular concentrations of unbound analytes. A small probe with a semipermeable membrane is implanted in tissue and constantly perfused. Small analytes in the interstitial fluid diffuse into the perfusate and are collected. Often, microdialysate concentrations of an analyte are only a fraction of the unbound concentrations in the extracellular space attributable to incomplete equilibration between these two compartments. Thus, it is necessary to determine the degree of equilibration between microdialysate and interstitium for each probe to accurately estimate concentrations. In this study, we investigated tissue urea as a solute to continually correct for nonequilibrium conditions. We used this method, along with relative diffusivities of urea and glucose, to monitor glucose levels before and during hyperglycemia as an example of how this method can be applied. No-net-flux experiments were performed on 10 anesthetized female rats with mammary adenocarcinomas. Microdialysis probes 1 cm in length with a molecular weight cutoff of M(r) 100,000 were used. Urea was added to the perfusate in concentrations of 0.83, 2.5, 5.0, and 13.33 mM. Microdialysate samples were collected every 15 min. For each rat, there was a linear relationship between the net urea concentration (outflow-inflow) and the urea concentration in the perfusate (inflow). Net flux should equal zero when perfusate and interstitial concentrations are equal. In an additional series of 13 rats, microdialysate samples were obtained before, during, and after administration of glucose at a dose of 1 g/kg. The interstitial tumor urea concentration was 7.8 +/- 0.3 mM compared with 6.2+/- 0.3 mM in plasma. There was a significant linear relationship between plasma urea (measured directly) and tumor urea (microdialysis measurement). Plasma urea concentrations were constant over time in all of the experiments, including those where hyperglycemia was induced. Hyperglycemia caused 7.7- and 3.6-fold increases in tumor and plasma glucose, respectively. There was no effect of hyperglycemia on tumor blood flow. Urea appears to be a useful low molecular weight relative recovery marker for tumor microdialysis. In combination with the determination of relative diffusivity between urea and the solute of interest, this calibration method may allow for quantitative measurements of tumor metabolites and unbound drugs.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…