• Diego Leoni, Deborah Falla, Carolin Heitz, Gianpiero Capra, Ron Clijsen, Michele Egloff, Corrado Cescon, Jean-Pierre Baeyens, and Marco Barbero.
• Rehabilitation Research Laboratory (r2Lab), Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SUPSI, Manno, Switzerland.
• Pain Pract. 2017 Feb 1; 17 (2): 176-184.

BackgroundPain drawings (PD) are frequently used in research to illustrate the pain response to pain provocation tests. However, there is a lack of data on the reliability in defining the extent and location of pain. We investigated the test-retest reliability in reporting an acute painful sensation induced by a pain provocation test using a novel approach for PD acquisition and analysis in healthy volunteers.MethodsForty healthy volunteers participated. Each participant underwent 2 upper limb neurodynamic tests 1 (ULNT1), once to the point of pain onset (PO) and once until the point of submaximal pain (SP). After each ULNT1, participants completed 2 consecutive PD with an interval of 1 minute. Custom software was used to quantify the pain extent and analyze the pain overlap. The test-retest reliability of pain extent was examined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC 2,1 ) and Bland-Altman plots. Pain location reliability was examined using the Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC).ResultsThe ICC values for PO and SP were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98), respectively. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (± 1.96 SD) in the Bland-Altman plots were 14 pixels (-1080;1110) for PO, and 145 (-1610;1900) for SP. The median JSCs (Q1;Q3) were 0.73 (0.64;0.80) for PO and 0.76 (0.65;0.79) for SP.ConclusionsPain drawings is a reliable instrument to investigate pain extent and pain location in healthy individuals experiencing an acute painful sensation induced by a pain provocation test.© 2016 World Institute of Pain.

18 keywords...

hide…