• Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. · Oct 1976

    Lung function changes in smokers with normal conventional spirometry.

    • M Marco and A Minette.
    • Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1976 Oct 1;114(4):723-38.

    AbstractThe comparative ability to detect early abnormalities in smokers by commonly used lung function tests was studied. Sixty-five healthy male nonsmokers served as a reference group and provided standards for 1-sec forced expiratory volume, vital capacity, end-tidal spirometry, spirometric forced mid-and end-expiratory flows, single-breath diffusing capacity, static lung volumes (helium method), and single-breath N2 closing volume measurements, In the present series of 80 male smokers, the measurements of forced mid-expiratory flow and forced end-expiratory flow did not improve the ability of the more conventional indices, 1-sec forced expiratory volume and the ratio of 1-sec forced expiratory volume to vital capacity, to detect obstructive lung disease. In 71 smokers with normal 1-sec forced expiratory volume and ratio of 1-sec forced expiratory volume to vital capacity, the end-tidal spirometry, diffusing capacity, and residual volume indices revealed 14,20, and 21 per cent of abnormalities. respectively. The single-breath N2 closing volume test (Phase IV/vital capacity and slope of Phase III) detected the greatest number of subtle changes in lung function; this was abnormal in 32 per cent of smokers with normal conventional spirometry. In young or light smokers, Phase IV/vital capacity was more frequently increased than the slope of Phase III; an incerse trend was observed in older or heavier smokers. The single-breath N2 closing volume test also provided the greatest number of abnormal results when other indices were impaired in the same subjects.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…