-
World journal of surgery · Apr 2015
ReviewMoving from data collection to application: a systematic literature review of surgical capacity assessments and their applications.
- Lucas C Carlson, Joseph A Lin, Emmanuel A Ameh, Wakisa Mulwafu, Peter Donkor, Miliard Derbew, Edgar Rodas, Nyengo C Mkandawire, Mitra Dhanaraj, Herve Yangni-Angate, Rachid Sani, Mohamed Labib, Roxana Barbero, Damian Clarke, Martin D Smith, Lawrence Sherman, Frederick A Mutyaba, Philip Alexander, Larry G P Hadley, Michael J VanRooyen, and Adam L Kushner.
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 600 S. Decker Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA, lcarlso7@jhmi.edu.
- World J Surg. 2015 Apr 1;39(4):813-21.
BackgroundOver the past decade, assessments of surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have contributed to our understanding of barriers to the delivery of surgical services in a number of countries. It is yet unclear, however, how the findings of these assessments have been applied and built upon within the published literature.MethodsA systematic literature review of surgical capacity assessments in LMICs was performed to evaluate current levels of understanding of global surgical capacity and to identify areas for future study. A reverse snowballing method was then used to follow-up citations of the identified studies to assess how this research has been applied and built upon in the literature.ResultsTwenty-one papers reporting the findings of surgical capacity assessments conducted in 17 different LMICs in South Asia, East Asia and Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa were identified. These studies documented substantial deficits in human resources, infrastructure, equipment, and supplies. Only seven additional papers were identified which applied or built upon the studies. Among these, capacity assessment findings were most commonly used to develop novel tools and intervention strategies, but they were also used as baseline measurements against which updated capacity assessments were compared.ConclusionsWhile the global surgery community has made tremendous progress in establishing baseline values of surgical capacity in LMICs around the world, further work is necessary to build upon and apply the foundational knowledge established through these efforts. Capacity assessment data should be coordinated and used in ongoing research efforts to monitor and evaluate progress in global surgery and to develop targeted intervention strategies. Intervention strategy development may also be further incorporated into the evaluation process itself.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.