• Franck Accadbled, Patrice Henry, Jérôme Sales de Gauzy, and Jean Philippe Cahuzac.
• Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital, Toulouse, France. faccadbled@wanadoo.fr
• Spine. 2006 Oct 15;31(22):2614-23.

Study DesignRetrospective analysis of a prospectively accrued series of 191 consecutive patients who underwent intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during scoliosis corrective surgery.ObjectivesTo compare the monitoring outcome of idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis. To demonstrate the usefulness of the epidural electrode. To report sensitivity and specificity of the monitoring method employed at a single institution.Summary Of Background DataReports in the literature emphasized the difficulty to obtain data in neuromuscular patients. Multimodality spinal cord monitoring has been recommended. Despite their still debated composition, neurogenic motor-evoked potentials have proven their validity in clinical practice.MethodsSomatosensory and neurogenic evoked potentials were attempted in all patients presenting for scoliosis correction between 1999 and 2005. Study patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1, idiopathic; group 2, neuromuscular; and group 3, miscellaneous origins.ResultsThe use of the epidural electrode demonstrated significant usefulness in the ability of monitoring otherwise nonmonitored patients, especially in group 2. Inability to obtain any evoked potentials occurred in 4 cases (2.1%). Five cases were found to be true positives. An adapted and rapid intervention permitted to avoid new postoperative deficit in all cases. There was no instance of false-negative data. The overall method sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 52.69%.ConclusionsThe use of a single epidural electrode allowing somatosensory evoked potentials recording and spinal cord stimulation alternately is a safe and valid method of intraoperative monitoring.

28 keywords...

hide…