• Victoria Misailidou, Paraskevi Malliou, Anastasia Beneka, Alexandros Karagiannidis, and Georgios Godolias.
• Laboratory Instructor, Department of Physical Therapy, Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, 57400, Thessaloniki, Greece.
• J Chiropr Med. 2010 Jun 1;9(2):49-59.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this literature review was to synthesize the existing literature on various definitions, classifications, selection criteria, and outcome measures used in different studies in patients with neck pain.MethodsA literature search of MEDLINE and CINAHL through September 2008 was performed to gather articles on the reliability, validity, and utility of a wide variety of outcome measurements for neck pain.ResultsDifferent types of definitions appear in the literature based on anatomical location, etiology, severity, and duration of symptoms. Classifications according to severity and duration of pain and the establishment of selection criteria seem to play a crucial role in study designs and in clinical settings to ensure homogeneous groups and effective interventions. A series of objective tests and subjective self-report measures are useful in assessing physical abilities, pain, functional ability, psychosocial well-being, general health status, and quality of life in patients with neck pain. Self-administered questionnaires are commonly used in clinical practice and research projects.ConclusionsBecause of multidimensionality of chronic neck pain, more than just one index may be needed to gain a complete health profile of the patient with neck pain. The instruments chosen should be reliable, valid, and able to evaluate the effects of treatment.

5 keywords...

hide…