• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 2009

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    A phase II multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled study of ethyl pyruvate in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

    • Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, Madhav Swaminathan, Alina M Grigore, Gary W Roach, Laura G Aberle, Jeffrey M Johnston, and Mitchell P Fink.
    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA. elliott.bennettguerrero@duke.edu
    • J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2009 Jun 1;23(3):324-9.

    ObjectiveEthyl pyruvate (EP) is an investigational drug that has been shown to protect animals in several models of critical illness including myocardial or mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury, sepsis, and hemorrhagic shock. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of EP administration to patients undergoing higher-risk cardiac surgery and to obtain preliminary efficacy data for the prevention of single and multisystem organ dysfunction.DesignDouble-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.SettingThirteen US hospitals.ParticipantsHigh-risk (Parsonnet risk score >15) patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or cardiac valvular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.InterventionsSubjects were randomized to placebo or EP (7,500 mg administered intravenously starting after the induction of general anesthesia followed by 5 more doses of 7,500 mg administered every 6 hours). The mean body weight (83 kg), corresponding to a dose of 90 mg/kg at each of the 6 dosing intervals, exceeds the dose of 40 mg/kg shown to be effective in many animal models.Measurements And Main ResultsThe primary composite endpoint consisted of any of the following occurring within 28 days postoperatively: death, mechanical ventilation >48 hours postoperatively, acute renal injury/failure using the established RIFLE criteria, or need for vasoconstrictors >48 hours postoperatively. One hundred two patients were studied (placebo n = 53 and EP n = 49). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups with regard to clinical parameters or markers of systemic inflammation.ConclusionDespite positive results in numerous animal models, the administration of EP does not appear to confer any benefit to cardiac surgical patients undergoing CPB.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…