• Acta paediatrica · Jul 2012

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Interventions to improve the oral feeding performance of preterm infants.

    • C Lau and E O Smith.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. clau@bcm.edu
    • Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jul 1;101(7):e269-74.

    AimPreterm infants have difficulty oral feeding. We hypothesized that a specific sucking and swallowing exercises vs. no intervention accelerate the attainment of independent oral feeding through a faster maturation of infants' oral feeding skills (OFS).MethodsVery low birthweight infants were randomized to a control, sucking and swallowing groups. Sucking consisted of active sucking on a pacifier, and swallowing of placing a milk bolus (0.05-0.2 mL) on the tongue where the bolus rests prior to entering the pharynx. Primary outcome was days from start to independent oral feeding (SOF-IOF). Secondary outcomes included overall transfer (OT, % volume taken/volume prescribed), proficiency (PRO, % volume taken at 5 min/volume prescribed), rate of transfer (RT, mL/min) over the entire feeding and infants' OFS levels. OFS levels were defined by PRO and RT.ResultsDays from SOF to IOF vs controls (21 ± 2) were similar for the sucking group (19 ± 2) and shorter for the swallowing group (15 ± 2; p = 0.019). Only the latter infants demonstrated more mature OFS levels than controls.ConclusionThe swallowing exercise is an efficacious intervention in facilitating the attainment of independent oral feeding, but not the sucking exercise. We speculate that the swallowing benefit resulted from an accelerated maturation of infants' OFS levels.© 2012 The Author(s)/Acta Paediatrica © 2012 Foundation Acta Paediatrica.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…