• A E Nicolau, G Ionescu, R Mehnic, and A Spătaru.
• Clinica de Chirurgie Generală, Spitalul Clinic de Urgenţă Bucureşti Calea Floreasca 8, sector 1, 71406, Bucureşti. anicolau@easynet.ro
• Chirurgia Bucharest. 2001 Nov 1;96(6):563-72.

AbstractThe role of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and therapeutic laparoscopy (TL) in abdominal trauma is not clear. Even after diagnostic punction lavage (DPL), ultrasonography (US), and CT scan (CT), in some cases is difficult to decide between laparotomy and observation. In 37 cases of abdominal trauma, a laparoscopic evaluation was done; 28 abdominal blunt trauma (22 associated with multiple trauma), and 9 abdominal wounds (8 stab wounds). In blunt abdominal trauma, DL was done for haemoperitoneum (26 cases), after DPL, US or CT. In three cases, with equivocal diagnosis, an extra abdominal operation in general anaesthesia was necessary. In abdominal wounds a DL was done for suspicion of penetration. All the patients were haemodynamic stable, TS > or = 12. A laparotomy was necessary in 12 cases (32.43%), a LT was possible in 5 cases (13.51%). In the rest of cases, a DL with or without lavage-drenage enough.

20 keywords...

hide…