• Military medicine · Aug 2009

    Echelon I interventions and triage are effective and concordant with echelon II care in combat operations.

    • Timothy R Hurtado and Christopher Montoya.
    • Denver Health Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Mail Code 0108, Denver, CO 80204, USA.
    • Mil Med. 2009 Aug 1;174(8):786-90.

    AbstractWe describe identified injuries, effectiveness of treatment, and triage categories for combat casualties at echelon 1 from April 1 to June 30, 2005 from western Iraq. A total of 133 casualties were evaluated including 12 who were killed in action and 7 who died of wounds. A medic or corpsman treated 75% of the remaining patients, 9% were treated by bystanders, 2% were seen by a physician or physician assistant, and 15% administered self-aid. Most injuries (84%) were blast related. Commonly wounded regions were the head (47%), lower extremities (40%), upper extremities (22%), and back (11%). Common interventions included dressings (37%), splints (8%), and intramuscular morphine (8%). Field triage categories at echelon I and casualty evacuation categories at echelon II were congruent. No significant injuries were missed and there were no detrimental interventions. In conclusion, combat casualties were assessed, treated, and evacuated appropriately by echelon I providers during this time frame.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…