• Anaesthesia · Apr 2012

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of malleable stylet and reusable and disposable bougies by paramedics in a simulated difficult intubation.

    • P Gregory, M Woollard, D Lighton, G Munro, E Jenkinson, R G Newcombe, P O'Meara, and L Hamilton.
    • Coventry University, Coventry, UK. p.gregory@coventry.ac.uk
    • Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr 1;67(4):371-6.

    AbstractIn a randomised crossover study, 60 ambulance paramedics attempted tracheal intubation of a manikin model of a Cormack and Lehane grade 3/4 view using a Portex stylet, Portex and Frova single-use bougies, and a Portex reusable bougie. Tracheal intubation within 30 s was achieved by 34/60 (57%) using the stylet, 18/60 (30%) using a Portex single-use bougie, 16/60 (27%) using a Frova single-use bougie and 5/60 (8%) using a Portex reusable bougie. The proportion intubating within 30 s was significantly higher with the stylet compared with any bougie (p < 0.001), but significantly lower with a Portex reusable bougie than any other device (p < 0.004). Participants rated the Portex reusable bougie as significantly more difficult to use than the other devices (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a relationship between previous experience and success rate for any device.Anaesthesia © 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…