-
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol · Aug 2012
Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following hysterectomy, vascular, and colorectal surgery.
- Deborah S Yokoe, Yosef Khan, Margaret A Olsen, David C Hooper, Maurice Greenbaum, Johanna Vostok, Julie Lankiewicz, Victoria J Fraser, Kurt B Stevenson, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program.
- Channing Laboratory and Infectious Diseases Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. dyokoe@partners.org
- Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Aug 1;33(8):768-73.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of inpatient pharmacy and administrative data to detect surgical site infections (SSIs) following hysterectomy and colorectal and vascular surgery.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingFive hospitals affiliated with academic medical centers.PatientsAdults who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy, colorectal surgery, or vascular surgery procedures between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2005.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of weighted, random samples drawn from 3,079 abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy, 4,748 colorectal surgery, and 3,332 vascular surgery procedures. We compared routine surveillance with screening of inpatient pharmacy data and diagnosis codes and then performed medical record review to confirm SSI status.ResultsMedical records from 823 hysterectomy, 736 colorectal surgery, and 680 vascular surgery procedures were reviewed. SSI rates determined by antimicrobial- and/or diagnosis code-based screening followed by medical record review (enhanced surveillance) were substantially higher than rates determined by routine surveillance (4.3% [95% confidence interval, 3.6%-5.1%] vs 2.7% for hysterectomies, 7.1% [95% confidence interval, 6.7%-8.2%] vs 2.0% for colorectal procedures, and 2.3% [95% confidence interval, 1.9%-2.9%] vs 1.4% for vascular procedures). Enhanced surveillance had substantially higher sensitivity than did routine surveillance to detect SSI (92% vs 59% for hysterectomies, 88% vs 22% for colorectal procedures, and 72% vs 43% for vascular procedures). A review of medical records confirmed SSI for 31% of hysterectomies, 20% of colorectal procedures, and 31% of vascular procedures that met the enhanced screening criteria.ConclusionAntimicrobial- and diagnosis code-based screening may be a useful method for enhancing and streamlining SSI surveillance for a variety of surgical procedures, including those procedures targeted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.