-
Comparative Study
Swallowing disturbance questionnaire for detecting dysphagia.
- Jacob T Cohen and Yael Manor.
- Voice and Swallowing Disorders Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. jacob_cohen@hotmail.com
- Laryngoscope. 2011 Jul 1;121(7):1383-7.
ObjectivesTo assess the accuracy of the swallowing disturbance questionnaire (SDQ) that had originally been designed and validated for detecting swallowing problems among patients with Parkinson's disease and was now applied for identifying patients with dysphagia associated with various other etiologies.Study DesignProspective.MethodsOne-hundred patients with the complaint of swallowing disturbances who underwent a full swallowing survey at the Tel-Aviv Voice and Swallowing Disorder Clinic participated. They all filled in the SDQ. The collected data included patient characteristics, medical history, and the results of an oromotor examination and a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The SDQ results were compared to the FEES and oromotor examination findings.ResultsThe responses to the questions in the SDQ were highly correlated with the findings of the oral part of the oromotor examination (85.71% sensitivity, 87.6% specificity). Items on the laryngopharyngeal phase reliably assessed dysphagia symptoms in correlation to the FEES examination (67.3% sensitivity, 76.7% specificity). The total SDQ score correlated with the total oromotor and the FEES scores (79.7% sensitivity, 73% specificity).ConclusionsThe SDQ is a sensitive and accurate tool for identifying patients with true swallowing disturbances arising from different etiologies and for indicating the need for more in-depth instrumental swallowing evaluations.Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.