-
- C Montes, P Mertens, P Convers, R Peyron, M Sindou, B Laurent, F Mauguière, and L Garcia-Larrea.
- Equipe d'accueil, EA1880 UCB, Lyon, France.
- Neurophysiol Clin. 2002 Nov 1;32(5):313-25.
AbstractElectrical stimulation of the motor cortex (MCS) is a promising and increasingly used neurosurgical technique for the control of refractory neuropathic pain. Although its mechanisms of action remain unknown, recent functional imaging data suggest involvement of the thalamus, brainstem and anterior cingulate/orbitofrontal cortex. Since some of these areas are also implicated in higher cognitive functions, notably attentional processes, we analysed cognitive ERPs and behavioural performance during an "oddball" auditory detection task in patients submitted to this procedure. Eleven consecutive patients undergoing MCS because of neuropathic refractory pain, ranging in age from 25 to 71 years, were included in the study. ERPs were obtained in all cases both during the application ("MCS-on") and within the 10 min that followed discontinuation of the procedure ("MCS-off"). In five patients, ERPs could also be obtained just before the start of MCS. When the patients' sample was taken as a whole, there were no consistent effects of MCS on the ERPs. There was, however, a significant interaction of MCS action with the patients' age, reflecting a significant delay during MCS of the cognitive responses N2 and P3 (N200 and P300) in the group of patients older than 50 years exclusively. This effect was rapidly reversible after MCS discontinuation. No MCS-related changes were observed in the N1 component. At the individual level, the effect of MCS on the endogenous ERPs was highly variable, ranging from a total stability of ERPs (mostly in younger subjects) to latency differences of tens of milliseconds in the older group. These results, together with recent experiments showing P300 alteration during repetitive transcranial stimulation, suggest that motor cortex stimulation may interfere with relatively simple cognitive processes such as those underlying target detection, and that the risk of abnormal cognitive effects related to cortical stimulation may increase with age. Although the procedure appears on the whole remarkably safe, complementary neuropsychological studies in this category of patients are advised, as well as caution to possible adverse cognitive effects when using MCS in the elderly, notably in the presence of pre-existent cerebral lesions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.