• Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. · May 2015

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Efficacy and safety of lornoxicam vs ibuprofen in primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, double-blind, double dummy, active-controlled, cross over study.

    • Jayshree C Patel, Parvati B Patel, Hemangini Acharya, Kanaklata Nakum, and C B Tripathi.
    • Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India.
    • Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015 May 1;188:118-23.

    ObjectivesStudy was planned to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lornoxicam in moderate to severe menstrual pain due to primary dysmenorrhea.Study DesignThis doubled blind, double dummy, randomized, comparable study of lornoxicam versus ibuprofen was conducted at Sir Takhtsinghji General Hospital, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India. Total 57 primary dysmenorrhea participants having mean age±standard deviation (SD) of 19.2±2.08 were analyzed. The participants were randomly allocated to either lornoxicam 8 mg or ibuprofen 400mg two times a day for maximum of three days on two consecutive menstrual periods. The different medication was taken on each cycle. The analgesic efficacy was compared by a total area under pain relief score to 4 and 8h, pain intensity difference, sum of pain intensity difference to 4 and 8h, peak pain intensity difference to 4 and 8h, peak pain relief to 4 and 8h, total medication consumption, rescue medication and participant global evaluation. Adverse effects were recorded in both groups.ResultsIn both treatments, efficacy parameters were significantly reduced at measured time points as compared to baseline. No significant difference was observed between lornoxicam and ibuprofen in terms of efficacy parameters: total area under pain relief to 4h (8.0±2.6 vs 8.3±2.7), total area under pain relief to 8h (22.4±4.6 vs 23.0±4.4), sum of pain intensity difference to 4h (-5.7±1.9 vs -6.0±2.0), sum of pain intensity difference to 8h (-17.5±3.3 vs -17.8±3.5), peak pain relief to 4h (3.4±0.8 vs 3.5±0.8), peak pain relief to 8h (3.9±0.5 vs 3.9±0.4), peak pain intensity difference to 4h (-2.6±0.7 vs -2.7±0.7), peak pain intensity difference to 8h (-3.3±0.6 vs -3.3±0.6). Total medication consumption, a requirement of rescue medication and global evaluation of efficacy were comparable in both groups. The incidence of adverse effect was also similar in both groups.ConclusionsLornoxicam appears to be a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.