• Eur J Pain · Jan 2003

    Interobserver reliability of diagnosis in patients with complex regional pain syndrome.

    • Anton C van de Vusse, Suzanne G M Stomp-van den Berg, Henrica C W de Vet, and Wilhelm E J Weber.
    • Pain Management and Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    • Eur J Pain. 2003 Jan 1;7(3):259-65.

    AbstractComplex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I), formerly reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), is a chronic pain syndrome of unknown aetiology. Its diagnosis is a clinical one, for which several criteria systems have been defined. Despite their widespread use, the reliability of these criteria has never been studied. In this interobserver study 25 chronic CRPS patients were interviewed and examined by six physicians. Through structured questionnaires signs, symptoms, and diagnosis were recorded, after which observer agreement for these was calculated with kappa statistics. Physicians' agreement in assessment of signs and symptoms in CRPS patients varied greatly. More importantly, final diagnosis of CRPS showed poor observer agreement (kappa: 0.20). The kappa values were higher, had physicians applied IASP criteria, but still insufficient. The application of Bruehl's criteria results in a fair kappa of 0.38, but then frequency of CRPS diagnosis in our study population decreased from 73% to 43% in comparison with physicians' own diagnosis. We conclude that, using current criteria systems, the diagnosis of CRPS is not reliable.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.