• S A Syverud, W C Dalsey, and J R Hedges.
• Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Feb 1;15(2):121-4.

AbstractEmergency transcutaneous cardiac pacing was studied prospectively in 19 patients presenting to the emergency department with a bradyasystolic cardiopulmonary arrest of 20 minutes duration or less. Pacing was initiated when conventional advanced cardiac life support (including atropine administration) and a fluid challenge failed to restore a pulse. Seventeen patients also had placement of transvenous pacemaker electrodes for cardiac pacing. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing rapidly established a blood pressure in the two patients who for clinical reasons did not receive a transvenous pacemaker. Five patients were transcutaneously paced within five minutes of cardiac arrest (Group 1) and the remaining 14 were paced between five and 20 minutes following cardiac arrest (Group 2). Two of the Group 1 patients were admitted and subsequently recovered full neurological and prearrest cardiac function. Fewer Group 2 patients developed a blood pressure (P = .04), and there were no patients with full neurologic recovery in this group (P = .06). Similar results were found for transvenous cardiac pacing; there was a greater incidence of a palpable pulse and measurable blood pressure (P = .05 for both) in the Group 1 patients than in the Group 2 patients. No difference in clinical outcome was noted between the two pacing techniques. These results support the concept that cardiac pacing must be initiated early if the outcome of bradyasystolic cardiac arrest is to be altered.

16 keywords...

hide…